Evaluating Vendors for Kirkpatrick Model Alignment in Training Effectiveness
In today’s tech-driven world, learning and development (L&D) professionals are constantly looking for solutions that promise to deliver comprehensive evaluation across all four levels of the Kirkpatrick Model. However, while many vendors claim to align with the Kirkpatrick Model, not all tools or platforms offer the depth of evaluation needed to truly assess the impact of training programs and drive meaningful learning outcomes.
When evaluating your vendor, it’s essential to go beyond the surface-level promises and ensure they are genuinely delivering on the core principles of training effectiveness. Let’s explore what you need to consider to ensure your chosen solution effectively measures training and development programs, evaluates learning outcomes, and delivers a significant return on investment.
Level 1: Don’t Settle for Satisfaction Scores
Many vendors make the mistake of focusing only on satisfaction scores, such as surveys or Net Promoter Scores (NPS). While these metrics can give insight into learner satisfaction, they fall short of providing the necessary data to evaluate whether the training content was truly relevant to the learners’ roles and job needs.
True Level 1 evaluation of the Kirkpatrick Model involves measuring relevance rather than just immediate reactions. This step is crucial because relevance predicts whether learners will be able to transfer knowledge to their work environments. It ensures that the training material aligns with the learner’s role, department, and business goals.
Ask yourself: Is your vendor measuring learner engagement in a way that indicates how likely participants are to apply the content? If your vendor’s evaluation tool is solely focused on satisfaction, it may be time to reassess.
Level 2: Are You Measuring More Than Multiple-Choice Tests?
Traditional assessments such as multiple-choice tests are widely used but may not be effective at measuring if learners can apply the knowledge they have gained in real-world scenarios. For example, imagine you are conducting training on cybersecurity. A multiple-choice test asking about phishing definitions won’t assess if employees know how to identify or avoid phishing attempts on the job.
To measure Level 2 (learning) effectively, your vendor should focus on real-world scenarios and assessments that simulate real job conditions. This might include role-playing, case studies, or interactive environments such as sandbox simulations where learners can practice skills in a risk-free setting. These types of assessments provide meaningful data on knowledge transfer, a critical component of evaluating training effectiveness.
Level 3: Performance Doesn’t Happen in 90 Days
Waiting for 90 days post-training to evaluate performance is too long in today’s fast-paced, ever-changing business environment. Many vendors still rely on long delays between training and evaluation, which often leads to inaccurate or irrelevant data.
A Level 3 evaluation under the Kirkpatrick Model requires more timely and continuous feedback on performance. Quarterly evaluations should be considered the minimum, with frequent performance reviews, observations, and 360-degree feedback built into the process. Look for vendors that provide real-time performance data and allow managers to track progress frequently. Immediate post-training assessments, follow-up surveys, and direct feedback can provide invaluable insights on how training is impacting employees’ job performance.
By incorporating these elements, organizations can get a much clearer picture of training impact and behavioral change early on, rather than waiting for outdated feedback months after the event.
Level 4: Is Your Vendor Tracking Leading Indicators?
Level 4 of the Kirkpatrick Model focuses on measuring the business impact of training programs. This level is critical because it evaluates how the training is linked to organizational outcomes such as increased productivity, improved efficiency, or higher employee engagement.
However, many vendors fail to track the leading indicators that predict long-term success. For example, leading indicators might include employee engagement scores, customer satisfaction ratings, or sales metrics that can be correlated with training programs. Without tracking these indicators, it’s difficult to assess whether the training program will translate into actual business results.
Ask your vendor how they integrate leading indicators into their evaluation framework. Are they working with your business to understand the metrics that matter most to your success? If not, they may not be delivering the full value of a business-aligned evaluation process.
How to Hold Your Vendor Accountable
It’s essential to hold vendors accountable for their claims about the Kirkpatrick Model. Don’t settle for generic promises. Ask for clear evidence of how they are measuring each level of the Kirkpatrick Model and ensuring it aligns with the latest training evaluation standards.
For instance, at Kirkpatrick Partners, we’ve partnered with Qualtrics to provide a solution that is not only built on the principles of the Kirkpatrick Model but is also fully validated by our team. This ensures that the platform provides actionable insights at each evaluation level—satisfaction, learning, behavior change, and business results. If your vendor hasn’t had this level of collaboration, it’s a strong indicator that they may not be delivering on their promises.
Prioritize Training Evaluation That Drives Business Results
When selecting a vendor, it’s crucial to ask the tough questions and ensure that their evaluation tools and methods align with the Kirkpatrick Model and are capable of measuring training effectiveness. By holding vendors accountable and focusing on relevant, timely, and actionable feedback, you can ensure that your organization’s training programs deliver measurable results that contribute to organizational success.
At Kirkpatrick Partners, we specialize in delivering cutting-edge evaluation solutions that measure the full impact of training, from initial learner reactions to final business outcomes. We also offer guidance on selecting the right vendor for your evaluation needs, ensuring that your tools are truly delivering on the promise of the Kirkpatrick Model.
Get the Full Value of Your Training Investment
Is your current technology fully aligned with the Kirkpatrick Model? Let’s chat to see if your vendor is truly delivering on the promise of training effectiveness. Reach out to us today and find out how we can help optimize your evaluation process and drive better business outcomes.
Want more? Check out the Kirkpatrick Podcast on your favorite podcast streaming platform for the full episode.
Watch the Show on YouTube!
